The Data Scientists Toolkit: Recall Explained

Today in this document I will explain the concept of recall using a confusion matrix and outlines situations where recall should be prioritized, such as in healthcare diagnostics, fraud detection, and imbalanced datasets. I will also discuss instances where recall might not be the ideal metric, like when false positives are expensive or when a balanced approach is needed.

The document further elaborates on what constitutes good recall values, ranging from high (above 0.8) to low (below 0.6), and provides real-world use cases across various domains, including medical diagnosis, finance, customer churn prediction, and disease outbreak detection. In conclusion, the document underscores that recall is a crucial metric in data science when the focus is on minimizing false negatives, but its application should be carefully considered based on the specific context and consequences of each decision.

Below are the key contents covered in the document:
•   Definition and Interpretation of Recall (Page 1)
•   Recall using Confusion Matrix (Page 2)
•   When to Use Recall
o   Situations where missing positive cases is costly (Page 3)
o   Imbalanced datasets (Page 4)
•   When Not to Use Recall
o   High cost of false positives (Page 5)
o   Balanced importance & high data volume (Pages 6 & 7)
•   What are Good Recall Values? (Pages 8, 9 & 10)
•   Use Cases
o   Medical Diagnosis (Page 11)
o   Financial Fraud Detection (Page 12)
o   Customer Churn Prediction (Page 13)
o   Disease Outbreak Detection (Page 14)
•   Summary (Page 15)

Hope you find this document insightful.

For more such posts on Data Science, follow along.